With the European Commission put to rule on Spotify’s issue centered on competitors into the music that is streaming, there are hints that the ruling will not be in Apple’s favor. This week, the Financial Times reported the EC will issue its first-ever fine against the tech giant for allegedly breaking EU law over competition in the music market that is streaming. The good is likely to be around €500 million (about $539 million USD), the report noted.

Instead of chalking within the fine due to the fact price of working, as an organization that made record as the* that is( surely could, the tech giant is taking the fight to the public.

In a statement shared with media today, Apple argued against the idea that Spotify has been harmed by any practices that are anticompetitive its component. (The declaration had not been granted by a spokesperson that is single but rather comes from Apple itself). It reads:

“We’re happy to support the success of all developers — including Spotify, which is the music that is largest streaming application in the field. Spotify will pay Apple absolutely nothing when it comes to solutions which have assisted all of them develop, upgrade, and share Apple users to their app in 160 countries spanning the globe. Fundamentally, their complaint is about trying to get access that is limitless each of Apple’s resources without having to pay everything when it comes to worth Apple provides.”

Apple stated also that Spotify features a 56% share associated with the marketplace, compared to 20% for Amazon musical and Apple Music’s 11%, per MIDiA’s 2022 report in the membership songs marketplace.

In inclusion, Apple shared lots of non-public facts about Spotify’s company, when it comes to Apple’s systems, including, for instance, that Spotify makes use of a large number of Apple’s APIs across 60 frameworks; that Spotify makes use of Apple’s testing that is beta TestFlight; that Spotify has submitted over 420 versions of its app to App Review, which were approved; and even that Apple engineers have helped Spotify solve various challenges, like those impacting hardware-accelerated media playback and battery optimization.

And, For those true quantity watchers nowadays, Apple additionally stated that Spotify’s application was indeed downloaded, re-downloaded, or updated significantly more than 119 billion times across Apple products — a stat we’d maybe not heard before, we have to note.

The undeniable fact that Apple is front-running the EC’s choice having its commentary that is own is, in and of itself.

It speaks to a company that so solidly believes that it demands comment and pushback that it’s doing the best thing for its own customers and developer partners that any sort of ruling that deems otherwise is so absurd. Apple thinks its system of in-app expenditures for things such as songs subscriptions saves customers not merely the inconvenience and trouble of getting to check out additional internet sites in the iPhone’s screen that is small they can just click the side button instead — but also protects against fraud, excess data collection, consumer confusion over cancellations, and errant purchases by children. (Of course, Apple is familiar with the latter itself.)

It believes that Spotify only wants to increase its profits, by leveraging regulations to its advantage. The allegation is that Apple’s App Store distorts completion in the music streaming market in the case of the EU complaint. It’s not entirely a complaint that Spotify is damaged, put differently, but that the type associated with the App shop could have thwarted various other competitors.

“Spotify is a player that is big the music streaming market but we don’t know what would have been the conditions without this,” EVP and competition chief Margrethe Vestager said about the EC’s investigation back in 2021. “There are other rivals to Apple Music — there are Deezer, there are Soundcloud. Smaller competitors and here we have real concerns about their developments. This is not a Spotify case — this is a music case that is streaming” she noted.

Spotify, nevertheless, is the loudest regarding the Apple musical competitors and it has struggled the organization on various other things, by way of example by phoning Apple’s brand new DMA principles “extortion” and a “complete and total ”

To that is farce protect its interests (and, Apple argues, consumers), Apple’s response to the EU’s DMA (Digital Markets Act) regulation is the introduction of a system that is new needs designers to cover its solutions beyond only App shop repayment handling. Instead, it today distinguishes repayment handling from other solutions by levying a “Core Technology Fee” for people designers who would like to work underneath the brand new DMA principles. The record, Apple disputes Spotify’s claims that it’s been harmed by any anticompetitive practices in other words, it wants developers to pay Apple for the work it does to create and maintain its iOS platform, where apps can run, rather than acknowledging that access to consumers’ favorite apps helps sell its iPhones.turning a quarterly profitFor. It speaks to the success Spotify has seen over the years, having grown its streaming app over 8 years from 25 million to 160 million subscribers — a 27% average growth rate. It points out that Spotify users regularly subscribe to the ongoing solution outside its application, and therefore Spotify qualifies for the “Reader app” exception to Apple’s principles, enabling it to connect straight to its site for account creation and repayment, comparable to Netflix.of the Apple One bundlesHowever, Apple appears to disregard the undeniable fact that Spotify

however tends to make headlines, you know, Spotify does face competition on iOS globally from Apple Music, which is preinstalled on iPhones, iPads and other Apple devices that it just laid off 17% of its workforce, and that. In addition to being offered as a standalone service, Apple’s music app that is streaming upsold to consumers as a key part

, which incorporate several Apple solutions, like iCloud+, News+, Apple TV+, yet others, in one place.

Apple additionally stresses exactly how closely Spotify did because of the Commission on its issue, having satisfied because of the regulators significantly more than 65 times considering that the examination started. The examination, nevertheless, is continuous for many years.

A representative when it comes to EC declined to discuss development linked to Spotify’s issue or any fines that are pending. The FT had reported the fine is expected to be announced month that is early next

Spotify was requested remark but didn’t have an response that is immediate. We anticipate one will likely to be upcoming, nevertheless, and certainly will upgrade if supplied.(*)Additional stating: Natasha Lomas (*)