The Division of Justice and 17 state attorneys common filed an enormous lawsuit towards Apple on Thursday morning, accusing the corporate of monopolistic smartphone practices. In the meantime, Fortnite maker Epic Video games has been accusing Apple’s iOS App Retailer of antitrust violations for years in an ongoing, arduous authorized battle.

Epic isn’t named explicitly within the 88-page lawsuit, however the gaming firm’s complaints are echoed throughout in depth dialogue of the App Retailer’s anticompetitive practices.

“Apple typically enforces its App Retailer guidelines arbitrarily,” the swimsuit says. “And it incessantly makes use of App Retailer guidelines and restrictions to penalize and limit builders that make the most of applied sciences that threaten to disrupt, disintermediate, compete with, or erode Apple’s monopoly energy.”

Epic’s core grievance in regards to the App Retailer is that builders should cede 30% of in-app purchases to Apple. And in contrast to Android units, iPhones don’t enable for sideloading apps, that means that Apple has management over any app in its App Retailer. For nearly a decade, Epic CEO Tim Sweeney has been a staunch critic of the income reduce, which he thinks is monopolistic and predatory towards smaller corporations. In 2020, Epic made it potential for Fortnite gamers to pay Epic immediately, relatively than giving a reduce to Apple — then, Apple eliminated Epic from the App Retailer, and now, 4 years later, we’re nonetheless watching the 2 corporations duke it out in varied authorized proceedings.

Whereas a decide dominated on the time that Apple can’t forestall apps from routing customers to various fee strategies, the iPhone maker was finally not deemed a monopoly.

Given previous rulings in Apple’s favor, it’s stunning that this lawsuit is aligned with a few of Epic’s grievances.

“Whereas Apple has lowered the tax it collects from a subset of builders, Apple nonetheless extracts 30 p.c from many app makers,” the swimsuit says. “Apple additionally generates substantial and rising income by charging builders to assist customers discover their apps within the App Retailer—one thing that, for years, Apple informed builders was a part of the rationale they paid a 30 p.c tax within the first place.”

Epic isn’t the one massive firm that has confronted off towards Apple. In January, as builders ready for the European Union’s new Digital Markets Act (DMA) to take impact, Spotify additionally stepped into the ring, calling Apple’s compliance plan “extortion” and a “full and whole farce.” Then in March, Apple was fined €1.84 billion for breaching antitrust guidelines available in the market for music streaming providers.

On Thursday, the Coalition for App Fairness (CAF) — which incorporates Epic Video games, Spotify, Deezer, Proton and different corporations — launched a press release in favor of the DOJ’s motion towards Apple.

“With at this time’s announcement, the Division of Justice is taking a robust stand towards Apple’s stranglehold over the cellular app ecosystem, which stifles competitors and hurts American shoppers and builders alike,” stated Rick VanMeter, government director of the CAF. “The DOJ grievance particulars Apple’s lengthy historical past of unlawful conduct — abusing their App Retailer pointers and developer agreements to extend costs, extract exorbitant charges, degrade consumer experiences, and choke off competitors. The DOJ joins regulators all over the world, who’ve acknowledged the numerous harms of Apple’s abusive habits and are working to handle it.”

Epic Video games declined For Millionaires’s request to remark. Sweeney, who’s often vocal about these points, has additionally been reticent on the matter.

“I’ll be off Twitter antitrust commentary between now and the top of my testimony within the Australian Epic v Apple and Google trial in Melbourne,” Sweeney posted, alongside a photograph he took in Melbourne.

For extra on Apple’s antitrust lawsuit, test right here: